Warren’s story, nonetheless, matches right into a a lot bigger sample, one that can certainly be acquainted to many ladies: It is the custom of sexism within the guise of scrutiny.
But that hasn’t prevented the junior accomplice’s lawyer from attempting to make use of Harris’ star energy to deliver consideration to a case not meaningfully associated to the senator. (In response, an announcement from Harris’ communications director underscores that the senator “has been and continues to be a staunch advocate for survivors and believes all folks should be assured their day in court docket.”)
Every of those examples is, in its personal manner, a distillation of age-old policing mechanisms and double requirements. Every additionally shines a light-weight on the inveterate sexism — girls as unreliable narrators, girls as answerable for his or her husbands’ skilled lives, girls as weak — that also, right now, takes up a lot house within the narrative.
Or to make use of Warren’s personal phrases, “I do not know what else you’d name it.”