That is the one potential takeaway from the continuing backwards and forwards between Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts over whether the former told the latter that he didn’t imagine a lady could possibly be elected president in 2020. And the feud received worse, not higher, throughout — and after — Tuesday night’s Iowa debate.

“Effectively, as a matter of reality, I did not say it. And I do not wish to waste an entire lot of time on this, as a result of that is what Donald Trump and perhaps a number of the media need. Anyone who is aware of me is aware of that it is incomprehensible that I’d suppose {that a} girl can’t be President of the US.”

Warren was then requested what her response was to what Sanders had mentioned again in 2018. “I disagreed,” she mentioned. “Bernie is my buddy, and I’m not right here to attempt to combat with Bernie. However, look, this query about whether or not or not a lady will be president has been raised, and it is time for us to assault it head-on.”

And that was it — till the tip of the controversy. Sanders and Warren approached each other and he caught out his hand. She didn’t shake it. What adopted was a brief but clearly uncomfortable conversation. As Sanders’ marketing campaign co-chair Nina Turner put it on CNN: “I am unsure what she mentioned, however you’ll be able to learn the physique language. Clearly, their dialog was not nice.”
Then the combat turned to social media. As of Wednesday morning, the hashtag “#neverWarren” was trending as Bernie allies took to Twitter to assault the Massachusetts senator as a mendacity snake. (Not kidding; snake emojis have been in all places within the anti-Warren tweets.) “Lie or mischaracterize your ‘buddy’s’ feedback, double down, refuse to shake his hand,” tweeted Kyle Kulinski, a outstanding liberal and YouTube host. “Are you watching America?” tweeted liberal activist and Sanders supporter Shaun King: “When @BernieSanders beat a Republican to win his congressional seat 29 years in the past, Elizabeth Warren was nonetheless a Republican. One motive she by no means misplaced to a Republican is that she was a Republican for the primary 47 years of her life.”
On the opposite facet of the argument, Third Means senior vice chairman Lanae Erickson tweeted this of the Sanders-Warren handshake-that-wasn’t: “That second when the dude who known as himself a “feminist” on his profile exhibits his true colours on date 5…You hate to see it.”

There are actual penalties to all of those uncooked emotions. Sanders and Warren are the 2 most outstanding liberals within the race, and for both of them to beat former Vice President Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination this 12 months, they are going to want the near-united help of the left. Up till a couple of days in the past, that appeared like a really actual risk, with Warren and Sanders refusing to assault each other and their supporters — on-line and off — largely aiming their rhetorical fireplace on the likes of Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

After Tuesday night time, nonetheless, the thought of the Sanders folks rallying round Warren if, after the primary few primaries and caucuses, she appears to be like like probably the most viable liberal candidate, now appears fanciful. And, vice versa for the Warren folks being cool with the thought of Sanders because the liberal selection for 2020.

And that’s true it doesn’t matter what the 2 principals say (or do not say) about that now-famous December 2018 assembly and/or the no-handshake second in Tuesday night time’s debate. What occurred Tuesday night time appears prone to reverberate not simply by way of the Iowa caucuses in 19 days’ time however the broader combat over who emerges because the liberal selection and whether or not — or not — the left is keen to rally round that particular person.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here